Master Facilitator Journal

Master Facilitator Journal | Issue #0539, May 22, 2012

View Steve Davis's profile on LinkedIn
facilitatoru blog
Dear Friends,

This week we look at a logistical question around group facilitation. How do we optimize the size of groups based on the task we need to accomplish? To support this week's article, Optimizing Group Size, I've drawn from research data contained in a paper written by Nicholas C. Romano, Jr. and Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr. entitled, Meeting Analysis: Findings from Research and Practice. This paper offers an excellent summary of meeting research data on many meeting issues, including group size, the results of which are summarized in the Application Section of this article.

If you or your colleagues are interested in submitting an article for consideration, please email your ideas. I'd love to hear from you. We hope our work continues to bring inspiration to your world. Thank you for being a part of our growing community and please continue to send your wonderful feedback.


Steve Davis


facilitatoru Membership
experiential learning cycle
Teleclass Facilitation

The Point

Optimizing Group Size
Optimize group size according to the task.

Logistics Skill

In this issue, I've adapted research data from a paper written by Nicholas C. Romano, Jr. and Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr. entitled, Meeting Analysis: Findings from Research and Practice. This paper offers an excellent summary of meeting research data on many meeting issues, including group size, the results of which are summarized in the Application Section below.

The first thing to consider regarding meeting size is that this is a variable over which you have some control! It is wise to consider that each person invited to a meeting is invited for a reason other than to be simply included. They are invited because they bring something tangible to bear on the meeting objectives.

Another important point around meeting size is that the complexity of group dynamics grows exponentially with the number of attendees. The findings of Romano and Nunamaker suggest that groups should be as small as possible while at the same time offering as many points of view as possible to avoid group think. This presents both a challenge and an opportunity in the selection of meeting participants. Participants who can hold divergent or conflicting points of view will be useful to have in most any meeting environment.

From the standpoint of group size with regard to training workshops, note that as the size of a group grows opportunities for full participation and intimacy lessen. This is why dyads and triads are so popular in training situations. In dyads, everyone has the greatest opportunity to verbally participant in the shortest amount of time. And in a one-on-one environment, intimacy and trust have the great opportunity to grow.



The following points summarize specifics around group size according to the research of Romano and Nunamaker.

  • Larger groups require more structure. Groups larger than seven quickly become too complex to effectively manage without the use of a facilitator.

  • Ideal group size is five to seven members and an odd number is participants is recommended to avoid deadlocks. Groups smaller than five may lack the breadth of expertise necessary to tackle the task.

  • Disadvantages of small groups. While the research results point to an optimally small group size of five to seven members, this small group size also offers two potential disadvantages:

    "First, only a few viewpoints are represented, which may lead to decisions of lower quality and impact than might be achieved with larger groups; and second, the small group may not have the critical mass needed to achieve the best creative problem-solving."

  • Ideal group size for decision-making and problem-solving. Research suggests that groups of seven to fifteen participants are ideal for decision-making and problem-solving meetings citing the following advantages:

    "All participants may easily be involved; everyone’s thoughts may be communicated; it is small enough to be informal and spontaneous and also large enough to allow for a facilitator and a scribe; and it seems to be the size which best creates synergy.

    They point out two disadvantages:

    1) Complexity is such that clear structure is required.
    A recorder and facilitator are both required, along with taking the time to record everything.

If you have anything to offer on your observations of group size in the arenas of training and facilitation please share them with me and I'll include them in an updated version of this article.

Add Your Comments


What are your experiences and discoveries around optimizing the numbers of participants in groups? Please click on Add Your Comments to share your questions, feedback, or experience.

This Week's Offer

Memorial Day Special
**Lifetime Membership Discount **
Through May 31st

FacilitatorU MembershipTo celebrate Independence Week here in the U.S., this week I'm offering a 50% discount on FacilitatorU Lifetime Memberships. Go here to view the features of this offer and enter the coupon code "holiday" to receive your discount.

What's FacilitatorU Membership do for you?

  • Save a significant amount of time, travel expenses, and training costs by tapping into all of our "just-in-time" training, tools, and resources from the comfort of your own home or office.
  • Access an increasing array of tools, training, and resources to support your work with groups.
  • Tap into a community of fellow facilitators, trainers, group leaders, and change agents for collaboration, learning, and support.
  • The wisdom and experience of a growing number of recordings of specialized experts in the field.
  • Use our articles to augment your training programs and group work.
  • Access a growing library of online tools, ebooks, and other resources to make your job easier.
  • Make yourself visible to others who visit this site looking for your talent.
  • Keep your skills up-to-date and your passion enlivened with regular contact with other change agents leading positive change and constructive action worldwide.
I've just come to the end of a series of workshops run over the last 8 weeks and wanted to thank you for all the guidance, education and support that you have provided via The workshops have been a resounding success, but that was due to the approach I learned from you about preparation; the confidence I gained from the teleclasses I attended and the regular reminders of the basic skills found in your weekly newsletter. It is clearly a winning combination. --Julia Amunwa, Programme Manager

Click Here to View Membership Features

About the satisfaction guarantee

If, for any reason, you are not satisfied with this package, simply email us with a request to refund/credit your credit card in the full amount and we will do so immediately. This policy completely removes the buying risk for you and keeps our customer-satisfaction rates extremely high.

©2001-2013. Powered by, Madison, WI.. All Rights Reserved.